Document Type
Technical Report
Abstract
Hydroelectric power in Alaska has had a curious history--and an instructive one. This study focuses on three separate projects: Eklutna, Rampart, and Devil Canyon. The Eklutna project functions today; Rampart was not constructed; and the Devil Canyon project is still in the planning stage. Yet for all their differences in location, goals, and fate, the projects were related; and, taken together, their histories highlight all the essential political elements involved in hydroelectric power construction. There is still a fourth project which is functioning today--the Snettisham installation near Juneau which is not considered in this paper. A complex decision-making process determines the progress of such large projects. In following these three Alaskan projects, we can gain a better perspective on the roles of the several government agencies and the public; thus we can assess some of the inherent complexities. Such an assessment fully substantiates the conclusion that it takes more than moving dirt to build a dam.
Publication Date
10-17-1978
Recommended Citation
Naske, Claus-M. and Hunt, William R., "The Politics of Hydroelectric Power in Alaska: Rampart and Devil Canyon -- A Case Study" (1978). WERC Publications . 93.
https://ualaska.researchcommons.org/uaf_mirl_werc_pubs/93
Handle
http://hdl.handle.net/11122/1817